<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: stewed tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onepeppercorn.com/2009/11/stewed-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onepeppercorn.com/2009/11/stewed-tea/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arnold</title>
		<link>http://onepeppercorn.com/2009/11/stewed-tea/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepeppercorn.com/?p=325#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I did some more research into the history of &#039;stewed tea&#039; and managed to push the origin of the phrase back to the 1850s.  I was going to post the results here, but it got long, so in the end I decided to turn it into a separate post, which you can find &lt;a href=&quot;http://library-keeper.livejournal.com/8048.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, with due acknowledgment to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some more research into the history of &#8217;stewed tea&#8217; and managed to push the origin of the phrase back to the 1850s.  I was going to post the results here, but it got long, so in the end I decided to turn it into a separate post, which you can find <a href="http://library-keeper.livejournal.com/8048.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, with due acknowledgment to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sworthen</title>
		<link>http://onepeppercorn.com/2009/11/stewed-tea/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>sworthen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepeppercorn.com/?p=325#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Thank you for pushing back the date! I wonder why coffee was thought to be as bad as stewed tea in that context?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for pushing back the date! I wonder why coffee was thought to be as bad as stewed tea in that context?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold</title>
		<link>http://onepeppercorn.com/2009/11/stewed-tea/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onepeppercorn.com/?p=325#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Earliest use in the Times Digital Archive is 1892, from a letter on seamen&#039;s food: &#039;The biscuit, which is the principal object of a seaman&#039;s diet, is usually more or less full of weevils .. To sit down to a pot of coffee or stewed tea with one or two of these vermin-filled biscuits to pull to pieces and eat, and this at the commencement of a passage of three or four months&#039; duration, with the certain prospect of this being the principal article of diet during that period, is sufficient to dishearten a &#039;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Tapley&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Tapley&lt;/a&gt;&#039; and to make him discontented with his lot.&#039;  It sounds as though the phrase was in pretty common use by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earliest use in the Times Digital Archive is 1892, from a letter on seamen&#8217;s food: &#8216;The biscuit, which is the principal object of a seaman&#8217;s diet, is usually more or less full of weevils .. To sit down to a pot of coffee or stewed tea with one or two of these vermin-filled biscuits to pull to pieces and eat, and this at the commencement of a passage of three or four months&#8217; duration, with the certain prospect of this being the principal article of diet during that period, is sufficient to dishearten a &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Tapley" rel="nofollow">Mark Tapley</a>&#8216; and to make him discontented with his lot.&#8217;  It sounds as though the phrase was in pretty common use by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

